Skip to main content
Created by potrace 1.11, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2013
NO
Search oslomet.no
  • About OsloMet
  • Study at OsloMet
  • Our research
  • Work for us
  • Alumni
  • University Library
  • Contact us
  1. OsloMet
  2. ...Intermediate levels are hidden
  3. Public defences
  4. Public defence: Ane Slaatto
!

This public defense has already taken place.

Public defence: Ane Slaatto

Ane Slaatto will defend her thesis for the PhD in Social Work and Social Policy with “Youth voices matter!" Safety and meaningful participation: Perspectives of youth and staff in Norwegian residential facilities.

Date
26. november 2024
Organizer
  • Faculty of Social Sciences (SAM)
  • Other
Type
Previous public defences

OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY
STORBYUNIVERSITETET

Postboks 4, St. Olavs plass
0130 Oslo
Tlf.: 67 23 50 00

Contact us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Norwegian
  • Accessibility statement
  • Cookies policy
  • Employee directory
  • Employee website
  • Student website
  • Upcoming events
  • Work for us

The trial lecture lasts from 10:00-10:45, and the title will be announced.

The candidate will defend her thesis at 12:00. 

The ordinary opponents are:

  • First opponent: Affiliated Researcher Veiko Pelto-Piti, Örebro University
  • Second opponent: Senior Researcher Esben Olesen, Nordland Research Institute 
  • Third opponent: Professor Jorunn Vindegg, Oslo Metropolitan University

The leader of the public defence is Vice-Dean Nathalie Hyde-Clarke, Faculty of Social Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University.

The main supervisor is Professor Gunn Astrid Baugerud, Oslo Metropolitan University.
The co-supervisor is Researcher Anneli Mellblom, Regional Centres for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (RKBU).     

Summary

This dissertation contributes to the literature with four published articles on how youth and staff experience safety, conflict management, and meaningful participation in residential care. It also deepens understanding of youth perspectives on living in residential facilities and highlights safety as an important concern for youth as well as for staff. The main positive finding is that staff experienced an increased safety and improved practice after attending the Basic Training Program in Safety and Security. Findings also point to some concerns. 

Results suggest that the facilitation and implementation of meaningful participation for youth living in residential facilities is inadequate, with one possible consequence being that the youth feel powerless in voicing their opinion and do not experience control and influence over their lives. Another concern is that several youths reported that they feel they do not matter and are on hold, just waiting for life to start.