Skip to main content
Created by potrace 1.11, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2013
NO
Search oslomet.no
  • About OsloMet
  • Study at OsloMet
  • Our research
  • Work for us
  • Alumni
  • University Library
  • Contact us
  1. OsloMet
  2. ...Intermediate levels are hidden
  3. Public defences
  4. Public defence: Justice Mensah
!

This public defense has already taken place.

Public defence: Justice Mensah

Justice Mensah will defend his thesis "The Role of Meaningful Stimuli in the Formation of Equivalence Classes" for the PhD in Behavior Analysis.

Date
8. april 2019
Organizer
  • Faculty of Health Sciences (HV)
  • Other
Type
Previous public defences

OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY
STORBYUNIVERSITETET

Postboks 4, St. Olavs plass
0130 Oslo
Tlf.: 67 23 50 00

Contact us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Norwegian
  • Accessibility statement
  • Cookies policy
  • Employee directory
  • Employee website
  • Student website
  • Upcoming events
  • Work for us

Trial lecture title: The role of verbal mediation in equivalence class formation.

Th ordinary opponents are:

  • First opponent: Professor Kenneth Reeve, Caldwell University, USA
  • Second opponent: Assistant Professor Karen Lionello-DeNolf, Assumption College, USA
  • Leader of the committee: Associate Professor Børge Strømgren, OsloMet, Norway

The leader of the public defence is Professor Ingunn Sandaker, OsloMet.

The main supervisor is Professor Erik Arntzen, OsloMet.

Thesis abstract

The current thesis examined equivalence class formation as a function of meaningful stimuli.

First study

The first study explored yields of class formation as a result of having zero, one, two or three meaningful stimuli as C-stimuli in three 5-member equivalence classes (A-B-C-D-E).

The results of the study showed that class formation yields are a function of the number of meaningful stimuli in to-be-formed classes.

Second study

The second study examined the inclusion of meaningful stimuli on equivalence class formation in large classes (three 7-member equivalence classes (A-B-C-D-E-F-G)) by exposing participants to two main experimental conditions:

  • ABS (to-be-formed classes consisted of only abstract stimuli)
  • PIC (to-be-formed classes consisted of abstract stimuli with the D stimuli as meaningful stimuli).

The results from Study 2 showed that class formation yields were higher for the PIC group relative to the ABS group.

Third study

In Study 3, three experiments examined the color of meaningful stimuli (Experiment 1), the inclusion or exclusion of meaningful stimuli in emergent relations test trials (Experiment 2), and the effect of the number and location of meaningful stimuli (Experiment 3) on three 5-member equivalence classes formation.

The findings from Experiment 1 showed that equivalence class formation is a function of the meaningful stimuli included in a to-be-formed classes and not necessarily the meaningful stimulus plus its color.

The findings from Experiment 2 showed that equivalence class formation enhancement by a meaningful stimulus is as a result of the inclusion of the meaningful stimulus during conditional discrimination training and not as a consequence of the mere inclusion of the meaningful stimulus in emergent relations testing.

In Experiment 3, the results showed that equivalence class formation is a function of the number and location of meaningful stimuli in a to-be-formed class.