Skip to main content
Created by potrace 1.11, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2013
NO
Search oslomet.no
  • About OsloMet
  • Study at OsloMet
  • Our research
  • Work for us
  • Alumni
  • University Library
  • Contact us
  1. OsloMet
  2. ...Intermediate levels are hidden
  3. Public defences
  4. Public defence: Siri Frisli
!

This public defense has already taken place.

Public defence: Siri Frisli

Siri Frisli will defend her thesis for the PhD in Social Sciences, specialization Journalism and Media Studies with "Conflict in a high-trust democracy. Exploring digital dissent in pandemic Norway".

Date
1. juni 2026
Organizer
  • Faculty of Social Sciences (SAM)
  • Other
Type
Previous public defences

OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY
STORBYUNIVERSITETET

Postboks 4, St. Olavs plass
0130 Oslo
Tlf.: 67 23 50 00

Contact us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Norwegian
  • Accessibility statement
  • Cookies policy
  • Employee directory
  • Employee website
  • Student website
  • Upcoming events
  • Work for us

The trial lecture will last from 10:00-10:45.
The title of the trial lecture: “Understanding and measuring online misinformation as a rare phenomenon in light of Mouffe and Habermas’ theories on dissent and consensus”.

The candidate will defend her thesis at 12:00. 

The committee is:

  • Professor Bente Kalsnes, Kristiania University of Applied Sciences
  • Associate Professor Frederik Hjorth, University of Copenhagen
  • Professor Roy Krøvel, Oslo Metropolitan University

Leader of the public defence is Vice Dean Steen Steensen, Oslo Metropolitan University.

Main supervisor is Senior Researcher Yuri Kasahara, Oslo Metropolitan University. 

Co-supervisor is Associate Professor Yngve Benestad Hågvar, Oslo Metropolitan University. 

Summary

This doctoral dissertation examines digital dissent during the COVID-19 pandemic by exploring the role of misinformation and critical humor as tools for contesting institutional authority in Norway. Using Twitter data spanning three years of the pandemic, it conceptualizes these practices as forms of political resistance within modern, liberal democracies.

The first article focuses on the task of misinformation identification, developing a semi-supervised self-training framework for short-text classification. The second article examines misinformation discourses, revealing ways in which vaccine-related misinformation was used to challenge institutional authority. The third article develops a framework for multimodal humor detection, and explores the use of humor for delineating symbolic boundaries between citizens and political elite.

Together, these articles provide empirical insight into how digital dissent operates in a high-trust democracy during a time of prolonged pressure and uncertainty.